Most of my
grapes are in! I can see the light at the end of the tunnel! It’s been a very
intense, and tiring, and stressful experience, but in the end, of course an
enjoyable one! So far I’ve harvested: Albillo, Garnacha, Doré, Tempranillo,
Sauvignon Blanc, Airén, and Malvar. The only one left is the Chelva, which I
should be taking in this week or maybe next.
This year
I’ve managed to be sensible and I’m only going to be making about 10,000
bottles of wine in total. Not like last year, when due to irrational exuberance
and not knowing how to say “No” I attempted to make 15,000 bottles, but had to
pour about 5,000 down the drain (see this old post)! Yes, this year I decided
to run a ‘tighter ship’ as it were, ie to consolidate on the same quantity
(10,000) and make them better, as opposed to trying to do more.
So I’ve
more or less made (am making, rather) the same style of wines as usual - plus
the odd experiment of course J.
Basically this
is what there’s going to be:
- Airén. No skin contact, just crushed, pressed, and racked once. All in stainless steel
- Doré. Just a wee bit of skin contact, 8 days this time, which is slightly longer than last year. In stainless steel, with an experimental lot in a baby amphora (which I lined myself with beeswax by copying a YouTube video from Georgia)
Unlined leaky baby amphora |
Lump of beeswax and mop |
Melting the beeswax |
Lining the tinaja with melted beeswax using mop |
Baby tinaja with Doré |
Stainless steel with Doré |
- Albillo. Lot #1 is my usual Albillo, ie 2 days maceration and then pressed and into a large tinaja. Lot #2 is a smaller lot (experiment), in stainless steel but with the grapes crushed underfoot, as opposed to using a manual crusher. Lot #3 is also small, 300 litres stainless steel, and with this I’m going to make an orange wine, so it’s been crushed but I’m going to leave the skins and stems in there for a few months and see what happens.
- Sauvignon Blanc, same procedure as last year, ie 10 days skin contact and then into tinajas
SB in large tinaja |
SB in small tinaja |
- Malvar. At the moment I’ve got some Malvar (still with skins and stems) in open top barrels and some in stainless steel, but I would like to get it all into tinajas, sometime and somehow! This will involve a bit of racking off and movement of liquids form one place to another, and some transdimensional winemaking, ie putting larger volumes into smaller volumes!
- Garnacha. For the first time I’m going to make a Garnacha in tinaja. This is Lot #1 which is quite big, in this large tinaja. Lot #2 is in stainless steel at the moment, and I’ll be pressing it off soon, into a big 500 or 600 litres oak barrel. Old barrels of course, because I don’t want the wine to taste of oak!
- Tempranillo. This will also soon be pressed into a 500 or 600 litre old oak barrel for aging.
And that’s
about it, except for the Chelva, of which i hope to do about 2 or 3 different
lots!
All of the
above I’ve been doing more or less constantly since the 9th August
(first Albillo harvest). There have been a few peaks of intensity, ie of
getting up at 5:00 in the morning and going to bed at 1.00 in the morning, but
of course not all days were like that. Not quite like warfare (as described by
‘who was it?’ as periods of intense boredom punctuated by instants of intense
fear) – harvesting and crushing/pressing is more like periods of intense
stress/tiredness combined with periods of worry and doubt (about what I did with
the grapes already and what I’ll going to do with the ones about to come in).
I think
this is because winemakers only get one chance per year to make their wines,
and you have to get it right (or at least not too wrong!). I suppose that if
you’re making beer, or bread, or cheese, or whatever, if you get one lot wrong,
it doesn’t really matter very much, because you can just try again next
day/week/month. Also, in my own case, even though I generally try to more or
less make the same wines each year (“if it ain’t broke don’t fix it!”) I don’t
actually follow set formulas and procedures (and my note-taking is terrible
anyway!).
On the
other hand, I’m not in the least bit worried about fermentation not starting or
getting stuck. Fermentation has always started for me and has never stuck. Nor
am I worried about “nasty” bacteria or “strange” yeast strains “infecting” my
must or wine. I think that these are irrational fears drummed into oenology
students by over-technical and control-freak oriented wineschools, who fight
against Nature instead of working with Her.
As you (readers)
probably already know, for fermentation to happen, I rely exclusively on the
natural yeasts floating around in the environment. I don’t purchase or use any manufactured
packets of yeast from a factory or laboratory.
The over-scientific
anti-Nature approach to fermentation is to first of all to sterilize the must
and kill all living creatures in it (bacteria, yeasts, etc) using sulphites and
then to inoculate with a manufactured strain of the “good” yeast Sacchoramyces Cervisiae according to
whatever flavour, style, mouthfeel, etc they want their wine to have. This is
OK (in fact it’s probably the ONLY way) to produce great quantities of
commercial wines that are pleasing to great quantities of consumers who don’t
really care very much about the niceties of wine (eg, terroir, complexity,
interesting characteristics etc).
But I don’t
want to make that kind of wine – there are millions of bottles of that, in
thousands of brands, available already in the supermarkets, all with pretty
labels and at appropriate price points! What I’m trying to do is to express the
terroir, the variety, the year, the climate, the sense of place, the tipicity,
etc of each wine that I make. And to do that, it’s essential to use all the
yeasts and bacteria and other micro-organisms that happen to live in your
winery, on your equipment and in and around your vineyards. And NOT exclusively
use a strain of Sacchoramyces Cerevisiae
extracted and propagated in a laboratory from a distant strain from some other part of
the world.
It’s my
understanding that it takes a few days for good old Sacchoramyces Cerevisiae to establish a foothold, reproduce itself
and then to totally dominate the fermentation process to the end, to the
exclusion of all other species, because (a bit like myself) it has a very high
tolerance for alcohol, as opposed to other species of yeast. When the grapes
come in, and for a few days afterwards, there is hardly any Sacchoramyces Cerevisiae yeast present at all. The yeast
population at this point is almost 100% non-Sacchoramyces species. So, statistically it does seem like a huge risk to
rely on this natural or spontaneous type of fermentation. But like I said
above, after a few days of fermentation when the alcohol level reaches around
5%, all these non- Sacchoramyces
species can’t stand the heat in the kitchen, and they die off because they have a very low
tolerance to alcohol. Now is the moment that the high alcohol-tolerant Sacchoramyces Cerevisiae takes over and
ferments the remaining sugar up to 15%.
I also
believe that it’s during these first few days, when Sacchoramyces Cerevisiae is not present in significant quantities,
and when those other ‘nasties’ are working, that the interesting, local and unique aromas, tastes and
flavours are created that give the wine its tipicity and a good, faithful and
interesting expression of terroir.
I’m not
saying that this is not risky. It is risky! If one of those ‘nasties’ (like the
black, hairy, spiky cartoon creatures used to sell toilet-cleaning products on
TV! hahaha!) manages to reproduce itself too much, then of course you’ll get a pretty
weird and probably not very nice wine – and certainly not expressive of the
terroir or anything else! But if you just take a few simple countermeasures,
the risk is practically reduced to zero: 1. Keep everything super-clean (tanks,
presses, equipment, floor, hoses, scissors, buckets, absolutely everything you
use). 2. Just bring in healthy, top quality grapes from healthy vines growing
in healthy, living, complex soils. Et voilá – no problemo!
And
lastly...
And lastly,
an update on my sparkling wine experiments! Not much to report since my last
post on that. Basically what I’ve discovered so far is that I have to bottle up
much later than I expected. I was thinking that around a density of 1015 or
1010 would be a good range, ie fizzy enough to be sparlkling but not too much
to erupt volcanically on opening the bottle. But no! I think I need to wait
till about 1005 or even 1000. I opened up a bottle recently that was bottles at
1007, and it too erupted volcanically. See this video. I’ll be bottling up more soon. Stay posted.
And even
more lastly, ... no, I’ll save my other news/gossip/rants for a separate post
next week J
it's amazing the association of ideas and especially of gestures that I often agree with you, Fabio, both in the vineyard and in the winery. Keep going, brother, your handmade style is the result of your great will and respect for the peasant culture
ReplyDelete